News

OSSMETER will be presented at the Open World Forum European Collaborative Innovation Track on Oct 31 in Paris!! Please check out our presentation at http://www.openworldforum.paris/en/tracks/238#talk_283 #owf14

See you in Paris at the Eurosite Georges V! http://www.openworldforum.paris/en/

Track: European Collaborative Innovation

Theme: THINK

Room: Bruxelles

On: Oct 31, 2014, from 13:30 to 15:35

14:30 - Automated Measurement and Analysis of Open Source Software, the OSSMETER EU Project

Duration: 15 minutes

Speakers: Alessandra Bagnato (Research Scientist & Project Manager, SOFTEAM)

OSSMETER aims to extend the state-of-the-art in the field of automated analysis and measurement of open-source software (OSS), and develop a platform that will support decision makers in the process of discovering, comparing, assessing and monitoring the health, quality, impact and activity of open-source software. To achieve this OSSMETER will compute trustworthy quality indicators by performing advanced analysis and integration of information from diverse sources including the project metadata, source code repositories, communication channels, bug tracking systems of OSS projects. OSSMETER does not aim at building another OSS forge but instead at providing a metaplatform for analysing existing OSS projects that are developed in existing OSS forges and foundations such as SourceForge, Google Code, GitHub, Eclipse, Mozilla and Apache.

Deciding whether an open source software (OSS) meets the required standards for adoption in terms of quality, maturity, activity of development and user support is not a straightforward process as it involves exploring various sources of information including its source code repositories to identify how actively the code is developed, which programming languages are used, how well the code is commented, whether there are unit tests etc., communication channels such as newsgroups, forums and mailing lists to identify whether user questions are answered in a timely and satisfactory manner, to estimate the number of experts and users of the software, its bug tracking system to identify whether the software has many open bugs and at which rate bugs are fixed, and other relevant metadata such as the number of downloads, the license(s) under which it is made available, its release history etc. This task becomes even more challenging when one needs to discover and compare several OSS projects that o*er software of similar functionality (e.g. there are more than 20 open source XML parsers for the Java programming language ) and make an evidence-based decision on which one should be selected for the task at hand. Moreover, even when a decision has been made for the adoption of a particular OSS product, decision makers need to be able to monitor whether the OSS project continues to be healthy, actively developed and adequately supported throughout the lifecycle of the software development project in which it is used, in order to identify and mitigate any risks emerging from a decline in the quality indicators of the project in a timely manner.

Previous work in the field of OSS analysis and measurement has mainly concentrated on analysing the source code behind OSS software to calculate quality indicators and metrics. OSSMETER aims to extend the scope and eectiveness of OSS analysis and measurement with novel contributions on languageagnostic and language-specific methods for source code analysis, but also proposes using state-of-theart Natural Language Processing (NLP) and text mining techniques such as question/answer extraction, sentiment analysis and thread clustering to analyse and integrate relevant information extracted from communication channels (newsgroups, forums, mailing lists), and bug tracking systems supporting OSS projects, in order to provide a more comprehensive picture of the quality indicators of OSS projects and facilitate better evidence-based decision making and monitoring. OSSMETER also aims at providing metamodels for capturing the meta-information relevant to OSS projects (e.g. types and details of source code repositories, communication channels and bug tracking systems, types of licences, number of downloads etc.), and eective quality indicators, in a rigorous and consistent manner that will enable direct comparison between OSS projects. These contributions will be integrated in the form of an extensible cloud-based platform through which users can register, discover and compare OSS projects, but which can also be extended in order to support quality analysis and monitoring of proprietary software development projects.

To achieve its aims, OSSMETER brings together experts in domain modelling (UDA), source code analysis (CWI), text mining (UNIMAN), open source development and software engineering (YORK), with industrial partners from diverse business domains, and under the guidance of an advisory board of internationally recognised experts in the field of OSS development and analysis . The provided platform will be a highly valuable supporting tool for:

  • Developers and Project Managers who are responsible for deciding on the adoption of OSS, as it will enable them to make decisions on hard facts and uniform quality indicators;
  • Developers of OSS as it will enable them to monitor the quality of the OSS projects they contribute to, promote the OSS they contribute to using independently-calculated and trustworthy quality indicators, and identify related projects for establishing synergies with;
  • Funding Bodies that are funding ICT projects which produce OSS, as it will allow them to monitor the quality and assess the impact of the produced software even after the end of the projects.

The presentation will also showcase the usage of OSSMETER within the Softeam Open Source Modelio Modeling Tool.

You need to be a member of OSSMETER Project to add comments!

Email me when people reply –

Project Partners

OSSMETER is partially funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme for Information and Communications Technologies.
Any opinions expressed on these pages are those of the author / organisation and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission.